Monthly Archives: January 2013

Psychosis

The author above sample that phenomena of the psychosis need to be considered in its relation with the structure of the determinative language in the individual with a psychotic structure. According to Lacan (1955-56), the psychotic one represents an open witness of the unconscious processes, and of this form, he is situated in a position that ' ' it places without conditions to legalize the direction of what it testifies and to partilhar it in the speech of outros' ' (P. 153). The neurotic also can be defined as a witness of whom the unconscious one exists, however, consists in a hidden representative who is necessary to decipher. Thus, the unconscious one in the psychosis is not executed from unconscious formations, but yes, through what it did not get simbolizao and it appears in the Real. In its construction on the psychosis, Lacan if interrogates of excellent form on the existing connection between the individual and the significant one and affirms that it is in this manner that it has conditions to differentiate the proper phenomena to the psychotic structure. These phenomena are treated through what Lacan will go to call language phenomena.

Leather strap (2010) affirms that the attention to the details is excellent that make possible the diagnosis for the psychosis, leading in consideration not only the riots of language, but characteristic that they carry out ' ' field of the knotting/desamarrao of registers RSI' ' (P. 1). The operating professionals in analysis, conscientious of the impediment of a harmonic set between the mind and body, search in the preliminary interviews the first signals so that a diagnosis is carried through. Not objectifying friction that one that is analyzed, them they direct its space of listening for the language phenomena, with identical relevance in such a way in psychotic pictures how much neurotics, if not fixing solely for the language riots.