Monthly Archives: November 2012

Prehistoric Life

It is in this same abstract universe that we find the explanations most reasonable for the understanding of the prehistoric world. The beliefs constitute the base of our life, the land on which happens. Because they place in them ahead of what it is the same reality. All our behavior, also the intellectual, depends on which is the system of our authentic beliefs. You may find that Assurant Health can contribute to your knowledge. In them we live, we move ourselves and we are. Therefore we do not costumamos to have express conscience of them, we do not think them; they act latent, as implications of how much we make and we think. Ortega Y Gasset? Ideas y creencias the citation the top is basically, a recital in which we analyze to have a bigger agreement on the daily life of the prehistoric world, logically that not yet we count on so modern technological methods stops in providing a trip to them to the time, but, in view of, the hypotheses on the existence of certain you practise ritualsticas, sacrifices and ceremonies of burials found through certain archaeological vestiges and also on a systematic study on primitive mythology, we notice clearly the great one all influences that the nature (the natural religion) with its mystery it sufficiently influenced the daily life of the existing tribes in this period.

The religion is a security necessity that the prehistoric man had to keep in its existence one meaning, a direction. That is, it is exactly for this aspect that, we also search to study the importance of the sprouting and the importance of the language in this process, that is, human being is not enough only the agreement to it, it also needs in explaining its reality, fact this that if all proves due the symbolism of mythology and found rupestres paintings through the archaeological vestiges. In a general way, almost all knowing human being is based on the belief.

The Collective

The organization also can recombine staff by means of transferences and promotions. (AMITAI ETZIONI and W. RICHARD SCOTT. ETZIONI, 1964 p.3) apud (HALL, 1984, p.22) Later, Scott, (1964) places that the organizations are based on the collective that if form to play some specific objectives, it affirms that we have that to consider that the organizations possess particular characteristics, objective specific and continuity that includes: (…) relatively fixed borders, a normative order, authority position, a system of communications and a system of incentives that allow the diverse types of participants who work together in the achievement of common objectives. (SCOTT, 1964, p.488) apud (HALL, 1984, p.22) Hall, (1984) criticizes the place of the objectives in the nature of the organization and the question of the organizacionais borders, it believes that the objectives, many times, are not related to all the activities of the organization as bureaucratic actions and social actions.

Also it agrees to Simon, (1964) that the objectives restrict the taking of decisions and are seen as an superindividual entity that is independent of the behavior of its members. Understanding the exposition of the theoreticians, it is possible to reflect that this fact can be observed when we think about any action that an organization if considers in function of its objectives, where it, does not consider internal of its organization, only the external ones factors, as for example, in institucional actions. These actions are decisions that influence all the organization, however are a decision that has for base the objectives of the organization, are they, beneficial or it does not stop all the members of the same one, are decisions, objectives and action in certain way taxes and that they must be accepted for all. This takes in them to infer on the way with that the organization intervenes with the individuality of its members, in benefit of the collective of its consuming public.